May 12th, 2008 Posted in traffic | No Comments »
Life after the congestion pricing bill is defeated
Nearly a year after Earth Day 2007, when Mayor Michael Bloomberg introduced his ideas for a congestion pricing bill, it was voted down during a closed-door meeting in Albany that saved lawmakers from going public with a vote for or against the plan.
Advocates of the defeated bill are still glad for the debate revived around the controversial issue.
(Click on the image to see video.)

The bill was part of the larger scheme put forward by the Bloomberg Administration as PlaNYC 2030, intended to make New York City a greener, more modern and efficient place.But the traffic control scheme wasn’t meant to be. Democratic Majority leader Sheldon Silver announced on April 7, 2008 that, despite the bill passing New York City Council and receiving a stamp of approval from a special commission formed to study the plan, the congestion pricing bill was dead. Naturally, this did not please the Mayor.“It takes a special type of cowardice for elected officials to refuse to stand up and vote their conscience on an issue that has been debated… for more than a year,” Mr. Bloomberg responded. “Every New Yorker has a right to know if the person they send to Albany was for or against better transit and cleaner air.”
Rather than let this issue stay under the rug, advocacy groups are pushing hard to make their voices heard on the issue of traffic. Some, like Transportation Alternatives, are setting high goals to get more people on bicycles this summer.
At the top of the advocates’ lists are ways to address parking, improve bus service, add train service and convince more drivers to leave their cars at home. The New York League of Conservation Voters has issued a report, “Building a Greener Future,” that offers numerous ways for citizens and government to work together to improve the city’s condition.
“Despite the Legislature’s rejection of congestion pricing,” the report said, “the city can still take steps to reduce vehicle-related carbon emissions by creating a variable-price parking program to increase the rate for street parking in the Manhattan Central Business District during working hours.”
On the pages of the Environmental Defense Fund’s website, viewers can compare other world cities’ results from congestion pricing. London reports a 12 percent drop in particulate matter, Singapore has 25 percent fewer accidents and Stockholm expects fewer premature deaths thanks to a significant reduction in NO2.
The latest PlaNYC progress report issued by Bloomberg’s administration, said projects in danger of not being completed, like the 2nd Avenue Subway and the Fulton Transit Center still need funding. By turning down congestion pricing, the Mayor claims we lose, “A $4.5 billion source of capital for transit and the $354 million that the federal government had offered for short-term transit improvements.”
In a letter to the City Council expressing his disappointment when they passed the bill, Leroy Comrie Jr., representative from Queens, said, “Our federal government has seen fit to bail out billion dollar Wall Street firms, while real families in this City are losing homes and jobs. And the message from this Council, in the midst of this crisis, is to impose another tax. I will not in good conscience vote in favor of this plan.”
Whether or not money is bundled with legislation, advocates still want to see the City Council do more to curb weekday traffic.
“It may seem revolutionary, but in the third world they’ve been doing things like this for ten years,” said Wiley Norvell, Communications Director for Transportation Alternatives.